Home  /  Insights  /  AML Compliance Pricing in Australia

What AML compliance actually costs in Australia

By AML Guard  |  May 2026  |  11 min read  |  AML/CTF Compliance

Most Australian AML/CTF pricing comparisons compare verification fees and stop there. They miss the bigger half of the bill: the program documents, risk assessment, training, reliance register and governance reporting an agency must produce to be ready for 1 July 2026. This article shows both halves, and how AML Guard bundles the second half into the standard subscription while letting customers pay for the first.

Last reviewed: 13 September 2026. Vendor pricing was sighted from public pricing pages in April and May 2026. Confirm directly before relying on any figure.

On this page

• → The two cost categories of AML compliance
• → Why do AML platforms charge per check on top of the subscription?
• → What does each major AML platform charge in 2026?
• → The governance layer: what gets metered if it’s not bundled
• → Are there hidden costs in AML compliance pricing?
• → Does using reliance under AUSTRAC’s rules come with a fee too?
• → Can AML check fees be passed to the customer?
• → How does AML Guard’s pricing compare to the rest of the market?
• → How to model Year 1 readiness cost
• → What questions should you ask any AML vendor before signing?
• → Bottom line
• → Frequently asked questions

The two cost categories of AML compliance

AML compliance for an Australian real estate agency has two cost categories. The first is verification cost: KYC, KYB, biometrics, PEP and sanctions screening, ongoing monitoring. The second is compliance operating cost: the AML/CTF program, risk assessment, customer acceptance policy, training, reliance register and governance reporting. Most pricing comparisons only show the first.

1. Verification cost

This is the part most pricing pages publish: a per-check fee for individual KYC, a higher fee for KYB on companies and trusts, optional add-ons for biometric liveness and ongoing monitoring. On a like-for-like ex GST basis, individual checks across the Australian Tranche 2 market run roughly $15 to $45. Per-business KYB starts around $35 and runs to $90 or higher for complex entities.

2. Compliance operating cost (the part most comparisons miss)

If the platform does not include a tailored ML/TF risk assessment, Customer Acceptance Policy, AML/CTF Program, training manual, staff training evidence, reliance register and governance reporting, those items still have to be produced and maintained. Agencies pay for that through one of three channels: a specialist consultant, an external training provider, or internal compliance-officer time. None of those are free.

AUSTRAC requires reporting entities to maintain a documented AML/CTF program with risk assessment, policies, procedures, systems and controls; conduct customer due diligence; screen for PEP and sanctions risk; keep records; and train personnel. The program must be approved by a senior manager before designated services begin. None of that is optional, and none of it produces itself.

Why do AML platforms charge per check on top of the subscription?

Verification has a real underlying cost. The Document Verification Service, biometric liveness, sanctions and PEP feeds, adverse media databases, and ASIC company extracts are all paid data sources. Most platforms pass those costs through to the agency line by line.

A standard individual identity verification touches several paid data sources: the Document Verification Service (run by the Attorney-General’s Department), a biometric liveness provider, a global sanctions and PEP feed, and an adverse media database. A company KYB check additionally pulls ASIC extracts at the regulator’s published fees. None of those are free for the platform.

Where vendors differ is in how they recover those costs. Some bundle a small monthly check allowance into the subscription. Some publish a per-check rate on top of the subscription. A few combine both, with overage rates that kick in once the allowance is exhausted. easyAML and AML Guard both publish customer-pay options. AML Guard goes further: customer-paid checks generate 100% credits against the agency’s subscription, capped at the licence fee.

What does each major AML platform charge in 2026?

Below is a shortlist of the most visible Australian Tranche 2 platforms with public pricing or real-estate-specific positioning. All figures are normalised to ex GST for comparability.

At a glance: subscriptions across the shortlist range from zero (PAYG providers) to $999 per month ex GST. Individual checks range from $15 to $45 ex GST. Business KYB checks range from $35 to $90+ ex GST. PEXA Clear is the cleanest pure pay-per-use model. easyAML is the most transparent subscription with bundled program and training. AML Guard is the only platform that publishes customer-paid checks with full subscription credit-back.

Sources sighted 4 May 2026: firstaml.com (real estate solutions and SOP), getapp.com.au, easyaml.com/pricing, aplyid.com/au/pricing/real-estate, pexaclear.com.au, amlguard.com.au. AML Guard published prices are stated ex GST per the AML Guard Terms of Service. Pricing changes; confirm directly before procurement.

Other identity and KYC providers (NameScan, FrankieOne, VerifiMe and similar) may support parts of the workflow but are not all full real-estate AML/CTF operating platforms with published Tranche 2 pricing. They are excluded from the shortlist.

The governance layer: what gets metered if it’s not bundled

The governance layer (risk assessment, AML/CTF program, training, reliance, audit and reporting) is what determines the second cost category. The pricing table’s ‘bundled’ column is doing too much work. The table below breaks it down into the specific obligations AUSTRAC expects, why each one has real replacement cost if a platform doesn’t include it, and the questions a procurement reader should put to any vendor.

Are there hidden costs in AML compliance pricing?

Yes, the costs that drive total spend are often the line items the home page does not feature. Our public-source review of Australian Tranche 2 vendor pricing pages found a consistent pattern of fees layered above the headline subscription.

Common hidden or under-disclosed line items include:

• Per-additional-entity surcharges. easyAML charges $49 per month for each entity above the included one to three. Multi-office agencies and franchise groups feel this fastest.
• Tier-gated white-labelling. easyAML restricts white-labelling to Professional and Enterprise. APLYiD includes branded flows by default but custom branding may attract further fees under their order form.
• Training delivered as a separate service. AMLHUB and First AML position training as part of a managed-service or partner relationship; confirm in writing whether it is included or requires a separate quote.
• Setup, onboarding and migration fees. Some quote-only vendors may charge a one-off implementation cost that does not appear on a public pricing page; confirm in writing before signing.
• Charges for abandoned or dormant cases. First AML’s SOP states abandoned cases are still billed at the per-case fee. AMLHUB’s terms allow post-termination retention to attract up to 50% of the current annualised subscription, billed in advance.
• Overage on identity check allowances. easyAML, AML Simple, AML Assured and AMLTranche each publish included KYC/KYB volumes that are easy to exceed, with overage rates ranging from $3 to $20 per check.

Stacked across a year of trading, these explain why two agencies on the same platform at the same volume can end up with very different invoices.

Does using reliance under AUSTRAC’s rules come with a fee too?

AUSTRAC positions reliance as a way to reduce duplicated CDD cost. Public pricing pages generally do not publish a separate reliance fee, but they also rarely explain whether reliance workflows are included at all. Where a platform does not include a reliance register, evidence-sharing workflow, senior-manager approval record and review reminders, the agency either duplicates the check or manages reliance manually.

Reliance under sections 37A and 38 of the AML/CTF Act lets one reporting entity rely on the customer identification carried out by another. AUSTRAC’s guidance on reliance describes it as cost-reducing and duplication-reducing. But reliance is not free of obligations: the relying entity must still assess risk, have a written arrangement (for ongoing CDD arrangements) or document case-by-case rationale, retain access to the KYC information, capture senior-manager approval where applicable, and keep evidence.

Those are not workflow extras. They are operating requirements. AML Guard publishes a CDD reliance register and a cross-tenant sharing hub as part of the standard subscription with no per-arrangement fee. Other vendors should be asked directly: is reliance supported, where is the evidence stored, and is there a per-case or higher-tier fee?

Can AML check fees be passed to the customer?

Customer-pays workflows are emerging in the Australian market. easyAML mentions customer-paid KYC and KYB on its pricing page. AML Guard’s published difference is the next step: customer-paid checks also generate credits against the agency’s subscription, capped at the licence fee.

AML Guard generates a secure payment link for each transaction party. The buyer or seller enters their card details on a Stripe-hosted page and pays the verification fee directly. The verification then runs against their identity, exactly as if the agency had paid for it.

Each customer-paid check generates a 100% credit against the agency’s subscription, capped at the licence fee. We did not find another public Australian Tranche 2 pricing page that combines customer-paid checks with full subscription credit-back capped at the licence fee. In practical terms: at the standard individual rate, a small number of customer-paid checks each month materially offsets the standard 3-user subscription. Active months trend toward zero net agency platform cost. Quiet months still carry the subscription; there is no smoke and mirrors here.

How does AML Guard’s pricing compare to the rest of the market?

AML Guard is not the cheapest per-check provider. It competes on agency-borne total cost of readiness and on what is bundled into the standard subscription. The honest comparison runs along three lines.

1. Sticker price per check

On a like-for-like ex GST basis, AML Guard’s $45 individual / $60 high-risk / from $90 entity rates sit above PEXA Clear ($40 individual / from $65 simple AU business) and within the upper end of the published ex GST range across other Australian Tranche 2 vendors. Some specialist providers publish lower per-check rates (the $3–$20 range exists in the market) but typically with simpler verification depth, smaller monthly allowances, or with the agency carrying the cost rather than the customer. If you are buying on sticker price alone, AML Guard is not the cheapest option in the market.

Since mid-2026 a budget tier has also emerged at $59 to $99 a month, some plans with checks included: AMLTranche, AML Simple, AML Shield and pay-per-check providers such as ClearAML and FreeAML. AML Guard is a mid-market platform and does not compete on that headline number. What is included in a $59 plan is a question for that vendor; the comparison worth making is what the subscription actually buys, set out below.

2. Agency-borne total cost

Once customer-paid credits are factored in, an agency listing several properties a month typically nets close to zero on the AML Guard subscription. At similar volume, agency-borne cost on competitor platforms ranges from roughly $2,000 to $10,000 a year before extras. easyAML is a credible counterweight here: its tiers publish included KYC/KYB credits, no setup cost, training and risk assessment inclusion. AML Guard’s difference is the combination of customer-paid checks with subscription credit-back, a white-labelled client intake portal, the CDD reliance register and cross-tenant sharing, native Rex status push, multi-entity support without a per-entity surcharge, and the broader investigations and audit workflow. It is also offered month-to-month or on a 12-month term, whichever suits the firm; easyAML publishes a 12-month term only.

3. What is in the box

The AML Guard subscription includes the full governance layer detailed in the table above: the program wizard that generates the four linked artefacts (risk assessment, AML/CTF policies, action plan and training manual), in-platform staff training with attestation and certificates, ongoing monitoring tooling, the cross-tenant sharing hub for reliance, multi-office and multi-entity tenant support without a per-entity surcharge, white-labelled client portal, Rex CRM status push-back, and an agent portal with opt-in SMS updates that shows each agent the tipping-off-safe status of their own cases without exposing the CDD record. The platform has been in production with Australian reporting entities since Tranche 2 commenced. The only agency-borne cost above the subscription is when the compliance officer makes a unilateral decision the customer is not in a position to fund: for example, escalating a case from standard CDD to enhanced CDD, or putting a customer on ongoing monitoring without communicating that to them.

How to model Year 1 readiness cost

Year 1 is different. Agencies must be ready before 1 July 2026: enrolled with AUSTRAC, with a senior-manager-approved program, a designated AML/CTF compliance officer, and trained staff. That readiness build is a one-off cost on top of the ongoing run-rate.

AUSTRAC’s newly regulated entities guidance confirms compliance becomes an operating cost the business carries every month. The Year 1 model captures both the initial build and the ongoing run-rate.

The Year 1 cost formula

Year 1 AML cost = platform subscription + verification usage + implementation/onboarding + program-document build + staff training + reliance setup and admin + reporting/audit evidence setup + CRM and admin time.

Two cost views every procurement model should show

• Agency invoice cost. What the vendor invoices the agency directly: subscription plus per-check usage.
• Readiness-adjusted TCO. Agency invoice cost plus the excluded governance work the agency must still buy or perform: risk assessment, program document, training delivery, reliance setup, reporting templates, audit evidence.

The two numbers can differ materially. A platform that publishes a low headline subscription but excludes the governance layer can produce a higher readiness-adjusted TCO than a platform with a higher subscription and a bundled governance layer. That is the calculation procurement should run, vendor by vendor.

What questions should you ask any AML vendor before signing?

Use this list to compare like with like. Public pricing pages rarely answer all of these questions, which is exactly the point. Ask each vendor in writing.

• What is the exact per-check fee for individual KYC, entity KYB, additional UBO expansion, biometric liveness, PEP and sanctions screening, adverse media, and ongoing rescreening, ex GST?
• Is reliance under sections 37A and 38 included in the subscription, charged per case, restricted to a higher tier, or unavailable?
• Does the subscription include AML/CTF program generation, ML/TF risk assessment, customer acceptance policy and training manual, with version control and evidence retention?
• Is staff training delivered in-platform with attestation and certificates, or as a managed-service add-on?
• How are abandoned, dormant, incomplete and duplicate cases charged? Are they billed at the same rate as completed cases?
• Can checks be customer-paid, agency-paid, or switched per case? Do customer-paid checks generate credits against the subscription, and are those credits capped or rolled over?
• What is the post-termination data export window? Is there a retrieval or retention fee after the export period?
• Is the CRM integration native, partner-built or API-only? Does it write compliance status back to Rex, VaultRE, Box & Dice, Eagle, PropertyTree or MyDesktop?
• What is the surcharge for additional offices, branches, trading entities, or supported users above the included tier?
• Will the vendor share sample governance artefacts under NDA (risk assessment, AML/CTF program, training manual, audit pack) so we can verify what ‘included’ actually delivers?

Bottom line

Per-check pricing is only one part of AML cost. The real cost is the operating layer (program documents, risk assessment, training, reliance, reporting and evidence) and whether it is bundled or bought separately. Choose the platform that bundles the governance layer your agency would otherwise have to buy, build or administer separately.

AML Guard’s commercial claim is straightforward. Verification is not free, and we are not the cheapest per-check provider. But the governance layer is bundled into the standard subscription, and customer-paid checks generate credits that offset the subscription up to the licence fee. For most agencies running a normal listing pace, the agency-borne total cost trends toward the subscription floor: with all the program, training, reliance, reporting and audit evidence already produced.

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to the questions agencies ask after they have understood the headline pricing comparison.

Is AML compliance software tax deductible for Australian real estate agencies?

AML software subscription fees and agency-paid verification fees may be deductible business expenses depending on your circumstances. Confirm treatment with your accountant or tax adviser.

When do I need to enrol with AUSTRAC?

Newly regulated Tranche 2 reporting entities must enrol with AUSTRAC from 31 March 2026 and be fully compliant by 1 July 2026. AUSTRAC’s enrolment guidance sets out the steps. Enrolment is free and takes about 20 minutes online.

Can I share AML check results with another agency to save costs?

Yes, under sections 37A or 38 of the AML/CTF Act 2006, with conditions. Section 37A reliance requires a written CDD arrangement and reasonable grounds to believe the third party has appropriate AML/CTF systems. Section 38 case-by-case reliance does not require a formal arrangement but limits safe-harbour protection. Both pathways still leave the reporting entity responsible for its own AML/CTF program; reliance is not delegation of accountability.

What happens if I use a an AML platform that does not support my obligations?

AUSTRAC does not certify, accredit or endorse any AML/CTF software. Using a platform whose features and outputs do not support AUSTRAC’s published expectations does not breach the Act on its own, but if the platform fails to support the obligations the entity is required to meet, the reporting entity carries the breach risk. The platform vendor does not. Always confirm the platform’s outputs map to AUSTRAC’s published expectations.

Do I need a different AML platform if I’m a property developer rather than an agent?

Property developers and real estate agents share the same Tranche 2 obligations under the AML/CTF Act and use the same designated-services framework. A platform purpose-built for Australian real estate generally serves both. The practical difference is the buyer-onboarding pattern: developers tend to onboard a high volume of buyers in concentrated launch periods, where customer-pays models and credit roll-over become more important to manage cost spikes.

How long do I need to keep AML records under the AML/CTF Act?

AUSTRAC requires reporting entities to retain customer identification records for at least seven years after the end of the relationship and transaction records for at least seven years after the transaction. Some real estate–specific records benefit from being held for eight years to align with conveyancing dispute windows. Choose a platform that retains records for at least the statutory minimum and lets you export them on termination.

Can I switch AML platforms mid-year?

Yes, but pay attention to data export terms. Several Australian Tranche 2 vendors restrict data export windows after termination, and some charge a retention or retrieval fee for records that remain on the old platform. Schedule the switch so you have time to export, validate, and import historical CDD records before the original subscription ends.

Sources

All sources sighted 4 May 2026 (Australia/Melbourne). Vendor pricing, inclusions and terms can change without notice. Confirm directly before relying on any figure for procurement or external publication.

AUSTRAC guidance

• Real estate designated services: austrac.gov.au/new-austrac/designated-services-newly-regulated-entities/real-estate-designated-services
• Reliance on customer identification by a third party: austrac.gov.au/business/core-guidance/customer-identification-and-verification/reliance-customer-identification-procedures-third-party
• Newly regulated entities, get ready for reform: austrac.gov.au/new-austrac

Vendor pricing pages

• First AML, real estate solution: firstaml.com/au/solutions/industries/real-estate
• AMLHUB Australia: amlhub.com.au
• easyAML pricing: easyaml.com/pricing
• APLYiD real estate pricing: aplyid.com/au/pricing/real-estate
• PEXA Clear: pexaclear.com.au
• AML Guard pricing: amlguard.com.au/pricing

Related reading

This article is general information only. It is not legal, financial, accounting or compliance advice and is not a recommendation to purchase any product. AML/CTF obligations remain with the reporting entity. AML Guard is a software platform and not a licensed AML/CTF advisor or law firm: for regulatory interpretation specific to your business, consult your own legal counsel or a licensed AML/CTF advisor. Comparative pricing reflects each vendor’s public pricing as sighted in April and May 2026 and may change without notice. Confirm current rates and terms directly with each vendor before relying on any figure for procurement or publication.

Last reviewed: 13 September 2026.